Read the evidence
Start with primary papers, frontier reports, podcasts, commentary, and tools, then see what each source can and cannot establish.
Stewardship Ledger is a public casebook for high-autonomy systems. Read the research behind the claim, model the trade-offs, name the people who can stop the action, and leave a seal another person can replay.
A safety tool is only useful when a person can change a decision with it. These are the actions the product is built around.
Start with primary papers, frontier reports, podcasts, commentary, and tools, then see what each source can and cannot establish.
A builder can create a case, change the authority and safeguards, and see the score respond in the same record.
An auditor can inspect every weighted factor, the public research signal, and the exact seal that links each revision.
A coding agent can call the same REST/MCP tools to read, score, create, update, and synthesize cases without a private key.
“The question is not whether a system is safe in the abstract. It is who gets to notice, stop, and change it.”A working thesis for the public ledger
Care is a control surface. Reversibility is a form of respect. Oversight without a route for affected people is only theater.
See the principlesThe evidence atlas separates primary research, first-party reports, practitioner commentary, and offline fallback before a synthesis is saved.
The architecture is intentionally inspectable: one scoring function, one persistence contract, one MCP surface, and an audit trail you can recompute.
Browse a source shelf with evidence grades, claims, limitations, topic links, commentary counterpoints, and a plain-language brief engine.
Five weighted factors turn autonomy, reversibility, oversight, impact, and voice into an explainable 0–100 signal.
Every case revision is chained with SHA-384, preserving the previous digest and a human-readable history.
The same REST resources and JSON-RPC tools are available to a browser, a script, or a coding agent.
Create a case in under a minute, invite a critical reader, and keep the disagreement attached to the decision.